Skip to main content

Alternative Partnership Models

For clients who prefer performance-based partnerships

Flexible Compensation Structures

For clients who prefer performance-based partnership over standard cash retainers, I offer alternative compensation models that align incentives and share risk. These models are typically paired with Visioneering retainer engagements.

A) Hybrid Cash + Revenue Share

Recommended for growth partnerships

How it works

You pay a lower monthly retainer in exchange for giving me a small [negotiable] percentage of the New Revenue I help generate.

Why use it

Lowers your upfront burn rate and aligns me directly with your sales growth. I only benefit when you benefit.

Safety net

Floor of $1,000 minimum (waived for the first 30 days of a new launch). This ensures small wins are still rewarded while protecting you during ramp-up.

B) Reduced Cash + Advisory Equity

How it works

You pay a significantly lower retainer in exchange for Advisory Equity ([negotiable] % of the company).

Why use it

Ideal for startups conserving cash who want a long-term partner invested in their eventual exit or sale. I become a true stakeholder in your success.

Terms

Equity typically vests over 2-4 years with a 3-month cliff. Both parties are protected, and commitment is mutual.

C) Success Fee

Best for specific one-time projects

How it works

Full cash retainer, plus a cash bonus (5-15%) if we hit a specific, pre-defined "home run" milestone.

Why use it

Simple, clear motivation for big milestones without complex equity or long-term tracking. Great for launches, funding rounds, or major revenue goals.

Example milestones

  • Successful product launch hitting X users in Y days
  • Closing a funding round at Z valuation
  • Reaching $XXX,XXX in monthly recurring revenue

D) Profit Share

Requires open books

How it works

You pay a lower retainer, and I earn a percentage of the Net Profit (after agreed expenses).

Why use it

Lowest risk for you—you only pay the bonus if the product is actually profitable. Requires "Clean Costing" transparency so we both understand the numbers.

Requirements

Transparent accounting and agreement on what counts as expenses. Best for established products with clear P&L tracking.

Important Notes

  • Custom Agreements: All alternative models require a written agreement outlining terms, metrics, and payment schedules
  • Alignment: These models work best when goals are clearly defined and measurable
  • Transparency: Some models (like Profit Share) require open-book accounting
  • Long-term: Most models are designed for 6-12+ month engagements

Not sure which model fits your situation? Let's talk through your goals, timeline, and constraints to find the right structure.

Ready to explore partnership options?

Let's discuss which compensation model aligns best with your business goals and growth stage.